Stoneridge Clutch Safety Interlock (Chrysler) Class Action Lawsuit Settlement

Stoneridge Clutch Safety Interlock (Chrysler) Class Action Lawsuit Settlement

Claim Deadline Reached!

Who Qualifies

The Settlement Class includes United States residents who currently own vehicles equipped with manual transmissions that incorporate CSIDs built between February 24, 2005 and January 1, 2007 (the “Relevant Period”). As explained below, each CSID has a date code that can be used by the Claims Administrator to determine whether it was built during the Relevant Period. Chrysler is conducting recall campaigns supervised by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that apply to some of these vehicles, and vehicles that are subject to the recall campaigns are excluded from the Settlement Class.

About How Much Money


What Proof is Needed


Case Information

Royal, et al. v. Stoneridge Control Device Inc., et al. Case No. 5:14-cv-01410-F District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

Case Description

Plaintiffs claim that the CSIDs in certain Chrysler vehicles equipped with manual transmissions are defective because they contain return springs that may fatigue. CSIDs operate to prevent ignition unless a vehicle’s clutch pedal is depressed. Plaintiffs claim that fatigued return springs in a CSID can fail such that a driver is able to engage the engine starter motor without the clutch pedal being depressed, which could result in unintended vehicle movement without warning. The same alleged defect could also prevent engine startup without prior warning, which could cause a crash. Plaintiffs allege that Stoneridge is contractually obligated to indemnify owners of vehicles containing the CSIDs for damages they have sustained, namely the need to replace their CSIDs. Stoneridge denies that the subject CSIDs are defective and denies that it owes any indemnity obligations to any of the owners of vehicles containing the subject CSIDs.

Amount Available for Settlement


Fill out Form Before


Settlement Contact Information

Rickey Royal, et al v. Stoneridge Control Device Inc.
c/o Heffler Claims Group
P.O. Box 58819
Philadelphia, PA 19102-8819
Leave a Reply